NetworkNature is facilitating the development of the EU R&I Roadmap for Nature-based solutions and is now opening a public consultation on its first draft until 21st October. Find the first draft here. This Roadmap aims to bring forward key levers for R&I to help achieve EU goals for NBS development and deployment, further bridge knowledge needs and implementation gaps, and contribute to facilitating synergies and complementarities between the multiple on-going and planned European R&I activities on NBS. The current draft of this roadmap has been co-constructed with many experts and actors, together with the European Commission DG R&I team on NBS and builds notably on a mapping of EU R&I projects on NBS conducted by NetworkNature, as well as its work on collecting knowledge gaps which resulted in the NetworkNature database of knowledge gaps. The consultation aims at retrieving feedback from a wider spectrum of actors in the field of NBS, and thus give the opportunities to contribute to the co-development of European effort on NBS. About you Name * Email address * Organisation * Country * - Select -AfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCaribbean NetherlandsCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongo (Brazzaville)Congo (Kinshasa)Cook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong Kong S.A.R., ChinaHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyIvory CoastJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacao S.A.R., ChinaMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorth KoreaNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinian TerritoryPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthélemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint MaartenSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluU.S. Virgin IslandsUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVaticanVenezuelaVietnamWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe Type of respondent * - Select - International research organisation/initiative European research organisation/initiative European Technology Platform University / Higher Education Public Research Institute Private Research Institute Scientific society or association Policy maker, advisor and public authority (international) Policy maker, advisor and public authority (national) Policy maker, advisor and public authority (local) Natural resources managers Direct economic operators of natural resources (fishermen, farmers, and professional organization) Private company (multinational/group) Private company (SME) Private companies (industry grouping) Private sector network/cluster Knowledge and Technology Transfer Organisation NGO for nature protection Other NGOOther... Type of respondent Other... By answering this survey, you accept that we will collect your contact details and your sector of activity to better analyse your answers and contact you later on in the context of this roadmap, if needed. This data will be securely processed and stored, in compliance with the European General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679, and used only for the purposes of this survey. I accept2 * I accept Which topics would you like to provide feedback on? You may select multiple topics. 1) General scope of the European roadmap for R&I on NBS 1) General scope of the European roadmap for R&I on NBS Not Appropriate Mostly not appropriate Neither appropriate or inappropriate Mostly appropriate Very Appropriate Overall, do you consider the vision and conceptual approach presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate (especially as described in introduction to the section "Roadmap to 2030")? Overall, do you consider the vision and conceptual approach presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate (especially as described in introduction to the section "Roadmap to 2030")? - Not Appropriate Overall, do you consider the vision and conceptual approach presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate (especially as described in introduction to the section "Roadmap to 2030")? - Mostly not appropriate Overall, do you consider the vision and conceptual approach presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate (especially as described in introduction to the section "Roadmap to 2030")? - Neither appropriate or inappropriate Overall, do you consider the vision and conceptual approach presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate (especially as described in introduction to the section "Roadmap to 2030")? - Mostly appropriate Overall, do you consider the vision and conceptual approach presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate (especially as described in introduction to the section "Roadmap to 2030")? - Very Appropriate Do you have any specific comments or additions concerning the key issues to be considered in the development of this roadmap? Do you have any specific comments or additions concerning the key issues to be considered in the development of this roadmap? Section 2 2) Methods and stock taking for the development of the European roadmap for R&I on NBS Methods presented in the European roadmap Not Appropriate Mostly not appropriate Neither appropriate or inappropriate Mostly appropriate Very Appropriate Overall, do you consider the methods presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate? Overall, do you consider the methods presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate? - Not Appropriate Overall, do you consider the methods presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate? - Mostly not appropriate Overall, do you consider the methods presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate? - Neither appropriate or inappropriate Overall, do you consider the methods presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate? - Mostly appropriate Overall, do you consider the methods presented in the European roadmap for R&I on NBS to be appropriate? - Very Appropriate Do you have any specific comments or additions concerning methods that could be considered in the development of this roadmap? Do you have any specific comments or additions concerning methods that could be considered in the development of this roadmap? Stock taking of support to R&I Not Appropriate Mostly not appropriate Neither appropriate or inappropriate Mostly appropriate Very Appropriate Overall, do you consider the stock taking of support to R&I to be appropriate? Overall, do you consider the stock taking of support to R&I to be appropriate? - Not Appropriate Overall, do you consider the stock taking of support to R&I to be appropriate? - Mostly not appropriate Overall, do you consider the stock taking of support to R&I to be appropriate? - Neither appropriate or inappropriate Overall, do you consider the stock taking of support to R&I to be appropriate? - Mostly appropriate Overall, do you consider the stock taking of support to R&I to be appropriate? - Very Appropriate Do you have any specific comments or additions concerning stock taking of NBS R&I at European level, as presented in this section? Do you have any specific comments or additions concerning stock taking of NBS R&I at European level, as presented in this section? Section 3 3) Roadmap to 2030 Overall scope of the four strategic pillars Not Appropriate Mostly not appropriate Neither appropriate or inappropriate Mostly appropriate Very Appropriate How do you consider overall scope of the four strategic pillars? How do you consider overall scope of the four strategic pillars? - Not Appropriate How do you consider overall scope of the four strategic pillars? - Mostly not appropriate How do you consider overall scope of the four strategic pillars? - Neither appropriate or inappropriate How do you consider overall scope of the four strategic pillars? - Mostly appropriate How do you consider overall scope of the four strategic pillars? - Very Appropriate Please share any additional comments or recommendations: Please share any additional comments or recommendations: Pillar 1: Reinforcing NBS Knowledge and Data on NBS To what extent do you agree with the rationale and description of the pillar and its associated levers? Do not agree Mostly disagree Neither agree or disagree Mostly agree Fully agree 1.A Advancing knowledge for sustainable and effective NBS design and implementation 1.A Advancing knowledge for sustainable and effective NBS design and implementation - Do not agree 1.A Advancing knowledge for sustainable and effective NBS design and implementation - Mostly disagree 1.A Advancing knowledge for sustainable and effective NBS design and implementation - Neither agree or disagree 1.A Advancing knowledge for sustainable and effective NBS design and implementation - Mostly agree 1.A Advancing knowledge for sustainable and effective NBS design and implementation - Fully agree 1.B Better documenting NBS 1.B Better documenting NBS - Do not agree 1.B Better documenting NBS - Mostly disagree 1.B Better documenting NBS - Neither agree or disagree 1.B Better documenting NBS - Mostly agree 1.B Better documenting NBS - Fully agree 1.C Developing non-monetary and monetary valuation of NBS benefits 1.C Developing non-monetary and monetary valuation of NBS benefits - Do not agree 1.C Developing non-monetary and monetary valuation of NBS benefits - Mostly disagree 1.C Developing non-monetary and monetary valuation of NBS benefits - Neither agree or disagree 1.C Developing non-monetary and monetary valuation of NBS benefits - Mostly agree 1.C Developing non-monetary and monetary valuation of NBS benefits - Fully agree 1.D Better integrating social sciences and humanities for tracking NSB barriers and context-specifics 1.D Better integrating social sciences and humanities for tracking NSB barriers and context-specifics - Do not agree 1.D Better integrating social sciences and humanities for tracking NSB barriers and context-specifics - Mostly disagree 1.D Better integrating social sciences and humanities for tracking NSB barriers and context-specifics - Neither agree or disagree 1.D Better integrating social sciences and humanities for tracking NSB barriers and context-specifics - Mostly agree 1.D Better integrating social sciences and humanities for tracking NSB barriers and context-specifics - Fully agree Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Pillar 2: Closing the NBS research-implementation gap To what extent do you agree with the rationale and description of the pillar and its associated levers? Do not agree Mostly disagree Neither agree or disagree Mostly agree Fully agree 2.A Better integrating research and demonstration 2.A Better integrating research and demonstration - Do not agree 2.A Better integrating research and demonstration - Mostly disagree 2.A Better integrating research and demonstration - Neither agree or disagree 2.A Better integrating research and demonstration - Mostly agree 2.A Better integrating research and demonstration - Fully agree 2.B Engaging the private sector on NBS and operationalizing NBS in business 2.B Engaging the private sector on NBS and operationalizing NBS in business - Do not agree 2.B Engaging the private sector on NBS and operationalizing NBS in business - Mostly disagree 2.B Engaging the private sector on NBS and operationalizing NBS in business - Neither agree or disagree 2.B Engaging the private sector on NBS and operationalizing NBS in business - Mostly agree 2.B Engaging the private sector on NBS and operationalizing NBS in business - Fully agree 2.C Developing and testing tools to help bridge the gaps 2.C Developing and testing tools to help bridge the gaps - Do not agree 2.C Developing and testing tools to help bridge the gaps - Mostly disagree 2.C Developing and testing tools to help bridge the gaps - Neither agree or disagree 2.C Developing and testing tools to help bridge the gaps - Mostly agree 2.C Developing and testing tools to help bridge the gaps - Fully agree Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Pillar 3: Mainstreaming the role of R&I in NBS policy-making To what extent do you agree with the rationale and description of the pillar and its associated levers? Do not agree Mostly disagree Neither agree or disagree Mostly agree Fully agree 3.A Advancing policy implementation across EU sectors and scales 3.A Advancing policy implementation across EU sectors and scales - Do not agree 3.A Advancing policy implementation across EU sectors and scales - Mostly disagree 3.A Advancing policy implementation across EU sectors and scales - Neither agree or disagree 3.A Advancing policy implementation across EU sectors and scales - Mostly agree 3.A Advancing policy implementation across EU sectors and scales - Fully agree 3.B Enabling supportive conditions and legal frameworks through R&I 3.B Enabling supportive conditions and legal frameworks through R&I - Do not agree 3.B Enabling supportive conditions and legal frameworks through R&I - Mostly disagree 3.B Enabling supportive conditions and legal frameworks through R&I - Neither agree or disagree 3.B Enabling supportive conditions and legal frameworks through R&I - Mostly agree 3.B Enabling supportive conditions and legal frameworks through R&I - Fully agree 3.C EU R&I supporting and ambitious international agenda on NBS 3.C EU R&I supporting and ambitious international agenda on NBS - Do not agree 3.C EU R&I supporting and ambitious international agenda on NBS - Mostly disagree 3.C EU R&I supporting and ambitious international agenda on NBS - Neither agree or disagree 3.C EU R&I supporting and ambitious international agenda on NBS - Mostly agree 3.C EU R&I supporting and ambitious international agenda on NBS - Fully agree Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Pillar 4: Building awareness, capacities and dialogues on NBS To what extent do you agree with the rationale and description of the pillar and its associated levers? Do not agree Mostly disagree Neither agree or disagree Mostly agree Fully agree 4.A Raising awareness and empowering society on NBS 4.A Raising awareness and empowering society on NBS - Do not agree 4.A Raising awareness and empowering society on NBS - Mostly disagree 4.A Raising awareness and empowering society on NBS - Neither agree or disagree 4.A Raising awareness and empowering society on NBS - Mostly agree 4.A Raising awareness and empowering society on NBS - Fully agree 4.B Enabling transdisciplinary dialogue and the mobilization of local knowledge 4.B Enabling transdisciplinary dialogue and the mobilization of local knowledge - Do not agree 4.B Enabling transdisciplinary dialogue and the mobilization of local knowledge - Mostly disagree 4.B Enabling transdisciplinary dialogue and the mobilization of local knowledge - Neither agree or disagree 4.B Enabling transdisciplinary dialogue and the mobilization of local knowledge - Mostly agree 4.B Enabling transdisciplinary dialogue and the mobilization of local knowledge - Fully agree 4.C Developing skills and investments capacities for NBS implementation 4.C Developing skills and investments capacities for NBS implementation - Do not agree 4.C Developing skills and investments capacities for NBS implementation - Mostly disagree 4.C Developing skills and investments capacities for NBS implementation - Neither agree or disagree 4.C Developing skills and investments capacities for NBS implementation - Mostly agree 4.C Developing skills and investments capacities for NBS implementation - Fully agree Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? Please share any additional comments, resources or examples of initiatives/work addressing this pillar you want to flag? 4) Next step to Implementation 4) Next step to Implementation As NetworkNature finishes after the publication of the final roadmap, the implementation is foreseen in the follow-up consortium, NetworkNature+, with activities on evidence and knowledge generation, policy integration, as well as dialogue with programmers and funders, policymakers, as well as with the EC NBS Task Forces. We are co-developing this section with key institutions, organisations and advisors as currently described in the draft section, and in particular with R&I programmers and funders working on biodiversity. We are keen on hearing your views and ideas for this section’s development, in particular: 4a Not Appropriate Mostly not appropriate Neither appropriate or inappropriate Mostly appropriate Very Appropriate Overall, do you consider the preliminary approach to the roadmap’s implementation to be appropriate? Overall, do you consider the preliminary approach to the roadmap’s implementation to be appropriate? - Not Appropriate Overall, do you consider the preliminary approach to the roadmap’s implementation to be appropriate? - Mostly not appropriate Overall, do you consider the preliminary approach to the roadmap’s implementation to be appropriate? - Neither appropriate or inappropriate Overall, do you consider the preliminary approach to the roadmap’s implementation to be appropriate? - Mostly appropriate Overall, do you consider the preliminary approach to the roadmap’s implementation to be appropriate? - Very Appropriate Would you have suggestions of further major relevant audiences, institutions or organisations for the co-implementation of the European roadmap for R&I on NBS? Would you have specific suggestions for high impact coordination and/or collaborative activities that could be considered by NetworkNature+ for the implementation of this roadmap? 5) Other comments 5) Other comments Please indicate here any other comments you may have or suggestions for improvement of the European roadmap for R&I on NBS: (max. 500 words)